Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Donovan STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation and resulting sentence. Because he has already served the statutory maximum, we reverse and direct Defendant's immediate release.
On May 5, 1992, Defendant was charged with possession of cannabis, a third degree felony, punishable by a statutory maximum of five years. See §§ 775.082(3)(d), 893.03(1)(c), 893.13(1)(f), Fla. Stat. (1991). Defendant pled guilty, and the trial court withheld adjudication and imposed a sentence of eighteen months of probation. Thereafter, Defendant violated his probation four times, and the trial court revoked his probation, imposing new sentences, the last of which was seven years imprisonment. Between the third revocation of probation in 1995 and the fourth revocation in 1999, however, Defendant had served the statutory maximum sentence of five years. Although a trial court currently must impose a recommended guidelines sentence that is greater than the statutory maximum pursuant to section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes, that provision does not apply to offenses committed before 1994. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 516 (Fla.1998); Fance v. State, 645 So.2d 188, 188-89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Because Defendant's original substantive offense of possession of cannabis was committed in 1992, Defendant could be sentenced for no longer than the statutory maximum of five years for that offense. Defendant shall be released from custody upon receipt of this opinion, irrespective of any motion for rehearing.
PER CURIAM.
POLEN, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Nos. 4D99-2180, 4D99-2181.
Decided: March 28, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)