Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rose PICKER, Appellant, v. ROBERT M. BARRETT, INC., Appellee.
We affirm the trial court's findings that the commission agreement between Shelby Martin as Trustee for the Leisureville Plaza Shopping Center and Robert M. Barrett, Inc. was enforceable against Rose Picker as trustee for the Rose E. Picker Living Trust.
It is uncontroverted that Picker's father, Felix Vicknair, acquired the shopping center in 1976 and has always been the beneficial owner of the shopping center. Through the use of various trustees, including John J. Hurtak, Shelby D. Martin, Stephanie Decca, and most recently Rose Picker, Vicknair was able to maintain direction and control of the shopping center and derive personal benefits therefrom. The real estate obligation was accepted and paid by whoever managed the trust and shopping center, including Picker when she assumed the obligations of the shopping center. We conclude that even after the shopping center was seized by the IRS and Picker satisfied liens against it in order to obtain a release, Picker was not a bona fide purchaser for value. She continued to pay Vicknair a monthly sum from her primary source of income, the shopping center.
By assuming the position of trustee at Vicknair's direction, Picker assumed the obligation of paying Barrett a real estate commission for the Office Depot lease renewals in accordance with the commission agreement. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment in favor of Barrett for unpaid commissions. As to the other issues raised on appeal, we affirm without comment.
AFFIRMED.
SHAHOOD, Judge.
KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D00-954.
Decided: November 15, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)