Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Keith J. BANNISTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Keith J. Bannister appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The circuit court clerk has been unable to locate the file of defendant-appellant Bannister as it has been sent out for microfilming, but it is clear from the materials attached to the motion that the defendant is not entitled to any relief. The charge of second degree murder, to which the defendant pled guilty, is a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life. § 782.04, Fla. Stat. (1979); Page v. State, 687 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). If enhanced for use of a weapon, see § 775.087(1), Fla. Stat. (1979), it becomes a life felony. State v. Whitehead, 472 So.2d 730, 731 (Fla.1985). Under either analysis, life imprisonment is an authorized penalty for this crime.
The second charge to which the defendant pled guilty was attempted first degree murder. It is clear from the materials the defendant has submitted that the charge was attempted first degree murder with a weapon. That offense is a life felony. See § 782.04(1), 777.04(4)(a), 775.087(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1979); Strickland v. State, 437 So.2d 150, 152 (Fla.1983).
The defendant argues that it was impermissible to enhance the attempted first degree murder charge for use of a weapon. The defendant is mistaken, as use of a weapon is not an essential element of the crime of attempted first degree murder. Strickland, 437 So.2d at 152; § 775.087(1), Fla. Stat. (1979).
It follows that the defendant's sentences are legal.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D03-884.
Decided: May 14, 2003
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)