Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ARCANUM INVESTIGATIONS, INC., a Virginia corporation, and DocuSearch, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS, INC., a Georgia corporation, Appellee.
This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of appellee, ChoicePoint Public Records, Inc., and against appellants, Arcanum Investigations, Inc., and DocuSearch, Inc., in a lawsuit alleging civil conspiracy, breach of contract, and fraud. After entry of summary judgment as to liability in favor of ChoicePoint, the trial court held a non-jury trial and found Arcanum and DocuSearch jointly and severally liable for compensatory damages in the amount of $67,561.19 and $500 in attorney's fees. Additionally, the trial court found ChoicePoint failed to establish its claim for punitive damages, which is the basis for the cross-appeal. We find the evidence supported compensatory damages in the amount of only $67,086.16, but otherwise affirm the order on appeal.
We have considered the other arguments on appeal and cross-appeal, and find no error. Appellants did not object to the trial court's proceeding on the issue of damages in the absence of a jury until the non-jury trial was well underway; such objection was simply too late to avoid waiver of the right to jury trial. See Del-Rena, Inc. v. KFM, Inc., 789 So.2d 397, 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (reaffirming principle that participation in non-jury trial without objection constitutes waiver of the right to jury trial) (citing Barth v. Fla. State Constructors Serv., Inc., 327 So.2d 13, 15 (Fla.1976)). Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for the trial court to amend the verdict consistent with this decision.
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
PER CURIAM.
STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D04-3390.
Decided: August 24, 2005
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)