Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Randolph NELSON and Mary L. Nelson, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. WAKULLA COUNTY, Florida, etc., et al., Appellees.
We have for review an appeal from a final order of the Circuit Court of Wakulla County. Appellants brought suit against Wakulla County, challenging the constitutionality of Wakulla County Ordinance 85-6 and seeking a refund of the special assessments. The lower court found the ordinance was, in fact, unconstitutional pursuant to City of North Lauderdale v. SMM Properties, 825 So.2d 343 (Fla.2002). However, it denied Appellants' request for a refund of the special assessments collected.
Appellants have been provided an opportunity to have their case heard and ruled upon by the lower court, as required by Dryden v. Madison County, 727 So.2d 245 (Fla.1999). Since the appropriate procedure has been provided, we must determine whether the case was properly adjudicated on the merits. The general rule is that “a taxpayer is normally entitled to a refund of taxes paid pursuant to an unlawful assessment.” Coe v. Broward County, 358 So.2d 214, 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). However the Florida Supreme Court has carved out an exception to a taxpayer's right to a refund where certain equitable considerations apply: (1) the tax was enacted in good faith, in reliance on a presumptively valid statute; and (2) there is a hardship involved in refunding the invalid assessments. Gulesian v. Dade County School Bd., 281 So.2d 325, 327 (Fla.1973). Since the trial court did not reach this issue in the final order, we remand this case to the trial court for a determination of whether equitable considerations, as set out in Gulesian, preclude awarding a refund.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
THOMAS, J.
BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D04-2710.
Decided: June 13, 2005
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)