Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nelida CONDINANZO a/k/a Nelida Quesada and J.C. Cash, Inc., Appellants, v. GREGORY A. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Appellee.
Nelida Condinanzo and the pawn shop that she owns, J.C. Cash, Inc., appeal entry of a default final judgment against them in an action brought by their former counsel, Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A. (law firm), to recover unpaid legal fees. Though properly served with the complaint, Condinanzo neglected to answer within the required twenty-day period. The clerk of the court entered default on the twenty-first day after service of the complaint and the trial court entered default final judgment several days later.
Condinanzo claims that she did not answer the complaint due to “excusable neglect”-to wit, extreme emotional upheaval due to numerous legal and personal problems. Further, she claims that her incarceration, which began the day after entry of default, adversely affected her ability to defend the lawsuit. Condinanzo requested that this court set aside the default judgment and remand to the trial court to hear evidence on her “excusable neglect” defense. Alternatively, she requested reversal on the issue of the amount of attorney fees claimed by the law firm in its complaint.
We reject Condinanzo's request to order a trial on the merits of the “excusable neglect” defense. We do agree, however, that under the instant facts, Condinanzo should have been able to dispute the amount of attorney fees owed. Therefore, we vacate the default final judgment and remand the case to the trial court for trial as to the issue of damages only.
The default final judgment is reversed and remanded for trial on the issue of damages only.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 97-2583.
Decided: December 24, 1997
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)