Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Wilson LUPIANEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
In this judgment and sentence appeal, Wilson Lupianez challenges the trial court's designation of him as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21(4)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2003). Because Lupianez did not qualify for sexual predator designation under the pertinent statutory provisions, we reverse the sexual predator designation.
Lupianez pleaded guilty to sexual battery in violation of section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (2003), a second-degree felony. The trial judge withheld adjudication, designated Lupianez a sexual predator, and sentenced him to five years' probation subject to sexual predator conditions. The sexual predator designation was made over the objection of counsel for Lupianez.
An offender who violates section 794.011(5) shall be designated a sexual predator if the offender has “previously been convicted of or found to have committed, or has pled nolo contendere or guilty to, regardless of adjudication, any violation of” certain enumerated statutory offenses. § 775.21(4)(a)(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); see also State v. J.M., 824 So.2d 105, 110 (Fla.2002) (“[I]n cases where the current offense is less serious, the sexual offender can still be designated a sexual predator, if the offender also has prior felonies. See § 775.21(4)(a)1.b., Fla. Stat. (2000).”); Meyers v. State, 884 So.2d 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that violation of section 800.04(4), Florida Statutes (2001)-a second-degree felony-did not result in sexual predator designation when defendant had no prior violations).
In this case, Lupianez did not have the required previous offense necessary for the sexual predator designation. The State concedes that the trial court erred. We therefore reverse the trial court's designation of Lupianez as a sexual predator and remand with directions that the designation be stricken from the judgment and that any conditions of probation based on the designation be stricken from the order placing the defendant on probation.
Sexual predator designation reversed; remanded for further proceedings.
CANADY, Judge.
STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D04-2934.
Decided: September 02, 2005
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)