Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Anne CRAVENS and Helen Snook, individually, Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. Margaret M. KULUBIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Theodore B. Potter, George F. Potter, Jeanet Romro, Carolyn Szabo, and Maribel O'Neal, all individually, Appellees/Cross Appellants.
The trial court dismissed this action for lack of prosecution on August 16, 1995, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). We reverse.
On December 7, 1994, the appellee Margaret M. Kulubis, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Theodore B. Potter, filed in the trial court her second request for admissions directed to the appellant Anne Cravens. The appellant Cravens filed her response to this second request for admissions on January 9, 1995. Both these filings occurred within one year prior to the filing of the appellees' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution.
Our supreme court has held that one defendant's filing of written interrogatories to be answered by a plaintiff constituted a sufficient affirmative showing of prosecution of the action to justify denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. Eastern Elevator, Inc. v. Page, 263 So.2d 218 (Fla.1972). A request for admissions, as in this case, should have the same effect. See Milligan v. Osborne, 682 So.2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (notice of taking deposition filed by defendant precludes dismissal for lack of prosecution; either party's record activity can serve as a basis for not dismissing action for lack of prosecution).
For the foregoing reasons, we reverse.
DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.
LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 95-04652.
Decided: May 02, 1997
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)