SCOTT v. STATE (1997)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.

Robert A. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-2536.

Decided: May 07, 1997

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

The trial court departed from the guidelines in sentencing appellant for burglary of a dwelling with an assault. The appellant's prior record consisted of a 1989 conviction for possession of cocaine, a conviction for a 1994 petit theft, a conviction for a third degree felony of uttering a forgery on February 1, 1995, and his present offenses which occurred on February 2, 1995. The instant offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault is a first degree felony. This history satisfies the “escalating pattern of criminal conduct” requirement for a departure sentence. § 921.001(8), Fla. Stat. (1995); State v. Darrisaw, 660 So.2d 269 (Fla.1995). Appellant's crimes were clearly escalating in nature from non-violent to violent. In addition, there was a pattern of criminal activity established by the temporal proximity of the crimes, particularly those in 1994 and 1995. This warranted an upward departure sentence under Darrisaw.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network