Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David Lee HODGES, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
David Lee Hodges petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We grant the petition.
First, Hodges contends, and the State properly concedes, that he was improperly sentenced pursuant to the permitted ranges contained in the 1988 sentencing guidelines. When Hodges committed his offenses on January 29, 1988, the 1988 sentencing guidelines had not yet been approved by the Florida Supreme Court and adopted by the Florida Legislature. See Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines (Rules 3.701 and 3.988), 522 So.2d 374 (Fla.1988). Therefore, because Hodges was sentenced pursuant to the permitted ranges in the 1988 sentencing guidelines that were not available in the 1985 sentencing guidelines, Hodges' sentence must be reversed and remanded for resentencing pursuant to the 1985 sentencing guidelines. Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987).
Next, Hodges contends that he was improperly assessed 226 points for two counts of second degree murder as a life felony and that this error resulted in a higher cell tier.1 Although the State concedes that this was error because second degree murder is a first degree felony punishable by life and that only 195 points should have been assessed for these two counts, the State contends that another error in scoring the defendant's prior record for aggravated robbery with a weapon makes the first scoring error harmless as he would remain in the same cell tier. On remand, the trial court should be provided with a corrected sentencing scoresheet.
Accordingly, the petition is granted. We reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to the 1985 sentencing guidelines.
FOOTNOTES
1. In the 1988 sentencing guidelines, the recommended range for Hodges' primary offense is the same as in 1985 sentencing guidelines.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D00-730.
Decided: August 23, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)