Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EXTENDICARE, INC.; Extendicare Health Services, Inc.; Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.; Seminole Care, LLC; Northern Health Facilities, Inc.; and Tandem Health Care of Florida, Inc. (as to Arbors at St. Petersburg), Petitioners, v. Susan JOHNSON, Executor de son Tort of the Estate of Norma J. Johnson, Respondent.
Extendicare, Inc.; Extendicare Health Services, Inc.; Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.; Seminole Care, LLC; Northern Health Facilities, Inc.; and Tandem Health Care of Florida, Inc. (as to Arbors at St. Petersburg) (hereinafter collectively “Extendicare”) have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to quash a pretrial discovery order requiring them to disclose allegedly confidential information about employees of a nursing home. We deny the petition.
The Florida Supreme Court has recently issued an opinion in Alterra Healthcare Corp. v. Estate of Shelley, 827 So.2d 936 (Fla. 2002), which held that a private employer, not subject to the Public Records Act, does not have standing to challenge a discovery request based exclusively upon the privacy interest of nonparty employees in their personnel files. In their petition for writ of certiorari, Extendicare is attempting to challenge the discovery order on this very basis. Because Extendicare has no standing, the trial court could not have departed from the essential requirements of law when it granted the Estate's motion to compel and ordered the disclosure of the requested information. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
SALCINES, Judge.
STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D01-4949.
Decided: November 08, 2002
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)