Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James HOENSTINE and Kathi Hoenstine, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., etc., Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellee, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, moves for rehearing of this court's order granting the motion of appellants, James and Kathi Hoenstine, for appellate attorney's fees. This is appellee's second motion for rehearing. In its motion, appellee argues that this court's denial of its first motion for rehearing was erroneous on the ground that its motion should not have been deemed untimely filed. Appellee erroneously relies upon Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c) which provides that review of orders rendered by the lower tribunal shall be by motion filed in the lower court within 30 days of rendition. Thus, it argues that it filed its motion for rehearing within 30 days of rendition. Rule 9.400(c) is inapplicable because appellee filed a motion for rehearing of this court's order granting appellants' motion for attorney's fees. Motions for rehearing must be filed within 15 days of the order sought to be reviewed. Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(a). Appellee filed its motion for rehearing on July 22, 1999. The order sought to be reviewed was entered on July 6, 1999. Appellee's motion for rehearing was one day late. Appellee's second motion for rehearing of the same order is unauthorized and untimely and is also denied.
Appellee's reliance on Allstar Builders Corp. Inc. v. Zimmerman, 706 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) is misplaced as that case involved a Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c) motion for review of a trial court's order granting a motion for appellate attorney's fees and entering a judgment for the fees. It is undisputed that a party filing a motion for review of such an award has 30 days in which to file its motion.
DENIED.
DAUKSCH, J.
W. SHARP, and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 99-6.
Decided: September 24, 1999
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)