Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AIM TARGET PROGRAMS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. FAMILY QUEST, INC., a Florida Corporation, William H. Covell, John D. Shouse, Ronald Murray, and Lloyd U. Young, jointly and severally, Appellees.
Appellant Aim Target Programs, Inc., challenges an order allowing amendment of appellee Ronald Murray's answer to seek attorney's fees under section 542.335, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), and the resulting order awarding attorney's fees to Murray. At the time the trial court heard and granted Murray's motion to amend his answer, the trial court had already entered final summary judgment in Murray's favor 1 and an order of dismissal on the remaining parties' joint stipulation of dismissal. Thus, the lawsuit had terminated, and the trial court had no jurisdiction to entertain a motion to amend the answer. See Miller v. Fortune Ins. Co., 484 So.2d 1221, 1223 (Fla.1986) (holding that trial court has no jurisdiction after litigation is concluded, except in “very limited circumstances” on a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540). Therefore, we reverse the order allowing Murray to amend his answer to assert a claim for attorney's fees under section 542.335. As a result, Murray failed to plead entitlement to attorney's fees under section 542.335, thereby waiving the claim. See Stockman v. Downs, 573 So.2d 835 (Fla.1991); Landry v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 731 So.2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, we vacate the attorney's fees order.
FOOTNOTES
1. Aim did not file a motion for rehearing, nor did it file a notice of appeal from the final summary judgment.
PATTERSON, Chief Judge.
THREADGILL and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D99-1494.
Decided: March 15, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)