NAVELLIER v. TOWN OF MANALAPAN (2007)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.

Louis G. NAVELLIER and Wendy M. Navellier, Petitioners, v. TOWN OF MANALAPAN, Respondent.

No. 4D07-264.

Decided: April 11, 2007

Jose M. Ferrer of Baker & McKenzie LLP, Miami, for petitioners. Trela J. White and R. Max Lohman of Corbett & White, P.A., Lantana, for respondent.

The above-styled petition for writ of certiorari is hereby dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1); Capone v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 774 So.2d 825, 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Petitioners argue we should deem their petition timely filed (the last day for filing was Friday, January 19, 2007, and it was not filed until Monday, January 22) because they were delayed in being able to timely file, inter alia, by the closing of the courts for the Christmas and New Year's holidays. The English dramatist John Webster noted that “Christmas Comes but Once a Year.” ¹ Since long before the founding of this country (not to mention the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure), however, we have all known it comes every year. We cannot, and should not, extend the jurisdictional time periods for filing this petition based on such an argument. The remainder of petitioners' arguments is equally unpersuasive.

FOOTNOTES

1. 1602. Collaboration with Thomas Dekker.

POLEN, J.

FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network