Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. James D. O'DONNELL, et al., Appellees.
The appellant, Department of Transportation [DOT], appeals an order awarding attorney's fees to appellee, James O'Donnell [O'Donnell], in an eminent domain proceeding. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
O'Donnell owns an interest in the property that DOT initially considered taking. He is also the attorney who represented all of the owners in the eminent domain proceedings. DOT does not contend in these proceedings that O'Donnell is not entitled to any fee because he is one of the owners of the property that DOT sought to take or because he seeks compensation for his time spent prior to the time DOT filed suit.1 Rather, DOT contends that if any fee is awarded to O'Donnell, it should be calculated pursuant to section 73.092(2), Florida Statutes (1997).
We conclude that O'Donnell is entitled to a reasonable fee under the facts and circumstances of this particular case. However, we find based on these unique facts and circumstances, that a reasonable fee can only be calculated on a finding of the number of hours the attorney reasonably expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate and taking into consideration the factors contained in section 73.092(2).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
FOOTNOTES
1. In its reply brief, DOT specifically stated, “It is not the Department's position that the property owner should receive no attorney's fee for representing himself or no fee for time spent prior to the Department filing suit.”
PER CURIAM.
SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur. THOMPSON, C.J., concurs, without participation in oral argument.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 5D99-2896.
Decided: December 01, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)