CHANEY v. STATE (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Darius T. CHANEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D26-0057

Decided: April 08, 2026

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

Darius T. Chaney, in proper person. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Senior Assistant Attorney General for appellee.

Affirmed. See George v. State, 213 So. 3d 966, 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“Double jeopardy challenges to a defendant's convictions are not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion.”); Salazar v. State, 675 So. 2d 654, 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“The double jeopardy argument Salazar advances in this case is a challenge to his convictions, not sentences, and thus is not cognizable under the rule regarding motions to correct illegal sentences.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network