Ramallah, Inc., Appellant, v. LLC (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Ramallah, Inc., Appellant, v. Brickell Group Construction, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D25-0217

Decided: April 01, 2026

Before GORDO, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); The Law Offices of Eddy O. Marban, and Eddy O. Marban, for appellant. South Florida Appeals, P.A., and Wm. Allen Bonner, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1985) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”); Belson v. Miller, 314 So. 3d 525, 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“We review a lower court's ruling on a motion to strike pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.150 for abuse of discretion.”); F.V. Constr. Corp. v. Cmty. Bank of Fla., Inc., 106 So. 3d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“A hearing on a motion to strike a pleading as a sham is not a hearing to resolve the merits of the issues, but to determine if there are any genuine issues to be determined.”); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.130(b) (“Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading, in another pleading, or in any motion.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network