Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES, etc., Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Vervil M. RAIDOJA, etc., Appellee.
In this nursing home abuse case, we affirm an order denying the nursing home's motion to abate and to compel arbitration. After the decedent's estate filed suit against the nursing home and its parent company, the nursing home filed a motion to abate and to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration provision in an admission agreement between the nursing home and the decedent.
The order on appeal states:
Although public policy favors the enforcement of arbitration agreements, this one is fatally flawed. Another paragraph of the same Admission Agreement states that the laws of the state of Alabama shall control interpretation, construction, and enforcement of the contract, and that venue shall be proper exclusively in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama. If an arbitration clause, such as this one, calls for arbitration that is to take place in a foreign jurisdiction, Florida courts cannot, over objection, compel arbitration. Post Tensioned Engineering Corp. v. Fairways Plaza Associates, 412 So.2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), see also Damora v. Stresscon Intl., Inc., 324 So.2d 80 (Fla.1976).
The admission agreement states that “Tuscaloosa County, Alabama shall be the sole and exclusive venue for any litigation, special proceeding, or any other proceeding between the parties that may arise out of, in connection with, or by reason of this Agreement.” We agree with the circuit court that the arbitration provision is not enforceable because the agreement requires arbitration to occur in another state. Damora; Post Tensioned Engineering.
Because of our affirmance on this issue, we need not address the additional issues raised by the parties.
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, J.
SHARP, W., and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 5D03-898.
Decided: July 25, 2003
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)