FUENMAYOR v. FUENMAYOR (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rebeca Vargas FUENMAYOR, Appellant, v. Ruth Vargas FUENMAYOR, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D24-1996

Decided: February 18, 2026

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR JJ.

Colson Hicks Eidson, P.A., and Thomas Allen Kroeger, for appellant. Lubell | Rosen, and Lori A. Sochin, Ronald G. Neiwirth and Dora Acherman, for appellees Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor and Reelaiah Silva Vargas; Ocean Bank Legal Department, and Brian Recor for appellee Ocean Bank.

Affirmed. See 951 Harbor Drive, LLC v. SD Constr., LLC, 394 So. 3d 690, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“On motion for summary judgment, the trial court may consider only matters raised in the pleadings.” (citing Wilson v. Stone, 172 So. 3d 559, 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015))); see also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(b)(2) (“A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim, must state a cause of action and must contain ․ a short and plain statement of the ultimate facts showing that the pleader is entitled to relief ․”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network