FAUSTIN v. REMY (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Morel FAUSTIN, Appellant, v. Jean Claude REMY, Appellee.

No. 3D24-1949

Decided: February 11, 2026

Before LOGUE, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ.

Andrew M. Kassier, P.A., and Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant. Michael S. Kaufman, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Selman v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 335 So. 3d 186, 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“When a trial court approves a settlement agreement and retains jurisdiction to enforce its terms, the trial court has the jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.” (quoting Platinum Luxury Auctions, LLC v. Concierge Auctions, LLC, 227 So. 3d 685, 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.600 (“In an action in which any part of the relief sought is a judgment for a sum of money or the disposition of a sum of money or the disposition of any other thing capable of delivery, a party may deposit all or any part of such sum or thing with the court upon notice to every other party and by leave of court. Money paid into court under this rule shall be deposited and withdrawn by order of court.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network