RHR GLOBAL LLC v. ROLLE III (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

RHR GLOBAL, LLC, Appellant, v. Alfred I. ROLLE, III, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D24-2102

Decided: January 21, 2026

Before GORDO, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

Christian Carrazana, P.A., and Christian Carrazana, for appellant. No appearance, for appellees.

RHR Global, LLC, the plaintiff below, appeals an order dismissing the action for lack of prosecution.¹ See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(e). RHR identifies record activity within the 60 days immediately following service of the court's notice of intent to dismiss for failure to prosecute. See id. (providing for dismissal where there is no record activity for 10 months immediately preceding the service of notice and no record activity in the 60 days immediately following service). Because the record reflects activity within the 60-day period immediately following the service of the notice, the court erred in entering the order of dismissal. See Waldeck v. MacDougall, 300 So. 3d 1218, 1219–20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Reversed.

FOOTNOTES

1. No appearance was entered for the appellees and no answer brief was filed.

BOKOR, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network