UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF CDC INC v. WC WH LLC (2026)

Affirmed. See Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817, 818 (Fla. 1993) (describing factors to be considered in evaluating whether dismissal with prejudice is warranted as a sanction for willful disregard of court orders); Ham v. Dunmire, 891 So. 2d 492, 496 (Fla. 2004) (“While no ‘magic words’ are required, the trial court must make a finding that the conduct upon which the order is based was equivalent to willfulness or deliberate disregard.” (quotation omitted)); Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Sombrero Beach Rd., LLC, 260 So. 3d 424, 428–29 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (noting that evidentiary hearing is “generally” required in order for trial court to make express findings of fact concerning all Kozel factors, but that order finding dismissal appropriate under Kozel will be upheld where trial court “include[s] in its written order findings of fact with respect to each Kozel factor, and also individualized findings with regards to the conduct of those individuals the lower court intends to sanction”).

PER CURIAM.