KASOWITZ v. KASOWITZ (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Yitzchok Yoel KASOWITZ, Appellant, v. Alison Ruth KASOWITZ, Appellee.

No. 3D25-0033

Decided: December 17, 2025

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.

Vanessa L. Prieto Law Offices, LLC and Vanessa L. Prieto (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant. Diaz Reus & Targ, LLP and Michael Diaz, Jr. and Zhen Pan and Gabor Gazso von Klingspor and John Foster, for appellee.

Affirmed. See McGuire v. Boscan, 337 So. 3d 124, 127 (“An order granting an injunction in the domestic violence context is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” (quoting Chiscul v. Hernandez, 311 So. 3d 55, 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021))); Shojaie v. Gables Ct. Pro. Ctr., Inc., 974 So. 2d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“It is the responsibility and duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned ․” (quoting Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So. 2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965))); Taylor v. Bateman, 927 So. 2d 1024, 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“The piecemeal transcripts deprived this court of the ability to review the record as a whole. Such record omissions are fatal to an appeal.”); Fay v. Craig, 99 So. 3d 981, 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (“To a large extent appellants proceed at their peril when they furnish a partial transcript.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network