WALKER v. WALKER (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Chad WALKER, Appellant, v. Julie WALKER, Appellee.

Nos. 3D24-2013, 3D25-1404

Decided: October 29, 2025

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander and Michael J. Ellis (Jacksonville), for appellant. Allison Rub, P.A., and Allison Rub; Jason M. Wandner, P.A., and Jason M. Wandner, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So. 2d 957, 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding a marital settlement agreement should not be disturbed unless it is “found to be ambiguous or in need of clarification, modification, or interpretation”); Kipp v. Kipp, 844 So. 2d 691, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“[A] court must construe a contract in a manner that accords with reason and probability; and avoid an absurd construction.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network