Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BENJAMIN HILLARD, Appellant, v. CITY OF LARGO, Appellee.
Benjamin Hillard appeals an order granting the City of Largo's motion for sanctions and the resulting final judgment imposing sanctions. Mr. Hillard represented Robert Halgren in a foreclosure action initiated by the City. A final judgment of foreclosure was entered against Mr. Halgren, and it was affirmed per curiam by this court. Halgren v. City of Largo, 387 So. 3d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024). After the appeal, the trial court granted the City's motion for sanctions based on section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2021), and directed that the City was entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs to be assessed equally against Mr. Hillard and Mr. Halgren.1 In its order, the trial court found as follows:
The totality of the trial court record reveals that even after that formal notice, counsel Hillard persisted with a course of dilatory and bad faith conduct completely unabated throughout the course of these proceedings. The record is replete with last minute, dilatory filings, and bad faith pleadings and assertions. Counsel has done nothing whatsoever to recede from any of these practices or to withdraw or abandon any of the bad faith claims or positions.
Thereafter, the trial court entered a final judgment requiring Mr. Halgren and Mr. Hillard to pay sanctions in the total amount of $28,529.00. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not err in awarding sanctions against attorney Hillard.
Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. This court dismissed the appeal as to Mr. Halgren.
PER CURIAM.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D2024-2067
Decided: October 17, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)