Jenna Alyssa Morales, Appellant, v. Max Adolfo Pirela, Appellee. (2025)

Affirmed. See § 768.74(5), Fla. Stat. (2019); Arena Parking, Inc. v. Lon Worth Crow Ins. Agency, 768 So. 2d 1107, 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (appellate court reviews a trial court's determination to grant a motion for additur under an abuse of discretion standard); Food Lion v. Jackson, 712 So. 2d 800, 803 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (affirming the trial court granting plaintiff a new trial and stating that “the questions from the jury and the verdict convey a strong indication of compromise on the issue of liability when it awarded [plaintiff] her medical expenses without considering non-economic damages”); FLNC, Inc. v. Ramos, 220 So. 3d, 1220, 1222-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (finding, after plaintiff sought additur, a new trial was warranted on all issues after jury sent out two written damage-related questions to the trial court; jury returned a verdict finding defendant negligently caused injury to plaintiff; jury awarded past medical expenses but nothing for pain and suffering; finding it was likely the jury “interwove the issues of liability and damages on the jury form in an inconsistent way, suggestive of a compromise on liability, possible confusion on the law of damages, or both”).

PER CURIAM.