HIGHTOWER v. STATE (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Michael HIGHTOWER, Jr. Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D2024-2269

Decided: October 10, 2025

Michael C. Nappi, Chief Assistant Regional Counsel, of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 5th District, Casselberry, for Appellant. Michael Hightower, Jr., Lake City, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm, without further discussion, the convictions and sentences imposed by the trial court upon Appellant after a jury trial. However, we remand with directions to the trial court to correct two clerical errors in its second amended judgment and sentence.

First, we direct the court to strike from the judgment the $100 assessment for investigative costs as these were not requested by the State. See Richards v. State, 288 So. 3d 574, 576–77 (Fla. 2020).

Second, the judgment inadvertently shows that Appellant pleaded guilty to the crimes for which he stands convicted instead of showing that he was tried and found, by the jury, to be guilty of the crimes.

Affirmed; Remanded with directions.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Jay, C.J., and Lambert and Soud, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network