Morin Cherfrere, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2025)

Affirmed. See Henry v. State, 948 So. 2d 609, 616 (Fla. 2006) (“To prevail on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Henry must show both deficient performance and prejudice arising from this deficiency.”); see also Calhoun v. State, 312 So. 3d 826, 846 (Fla. 2019) (“Calhoun's claim is, thus, too speculative to support postconviction relief.”); State v. Larzelere, 979 So. 2d 195, 211 (Fla. 2008) (“Larzelere has not shown counsel to be ineffective for not calling a concrete expert because she had not demonstrated what an individual qualified as a concrete expert would have testified to in this case or how such testimony would cast doubt on her guilt.”); Connor v. State, 979 So. 2d 852, 863 (Fla. 2007) (“Relief on ineffective assistance of counsel claims must be based on more than speculation and conjecture.”); Jones v. State, 845 So. 2d 55, 64 (Fla. 2003) (“Postconviction relief cannot be based on speculative assertions.”).

PER CURIAM.