J.J.L.J.J., S.A., et al., Appellants, v. Elides Arraiz, et al., Appellees. (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

J.J.L.J.J., S.A., et al., Appellants, v. Elides Arraiz, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D24-0040

Decided: August 27, 2025

Before SCALES, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ.

The Law Offices of Alan Dagen, P.A., and Alan P. Dagen (Weston), for appellants. Nordlund P.A, and Randall Nordlund; Cuevas, García & Torres, P.A., and Jose A. Torres, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Haas Automation, Inc. v. Fox, 243 So. 3d 1017, 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“We review a judgment rendered after a bench trial to ensure that the trial court's findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evidence.”); Underwater Eng'g Services, Inc. v. Util. Bd. of City of Key West, 194 So. 3d 437, 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (The trial court's findings of fact “will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous.”) (citation omitted).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network