SUSSMAN v. STATE (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

David Charles SUSSMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D2024-3343

Decided: August 15, 2025

David Charles Sussman, Arcadia, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

David Charles Sussman (“Appellant”) pro se appeals an order denying his postconviction motions. We affirm this order without further discussion.

This Court has previously reviewed and ruled upon multiple meritless and duplicative filings of Appellant stemming from this same case. Because it appears that Appellant's filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Volusia County Circuit Court Case No. 2001-36686-CFAES may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); Lavender v. State, 6 So. 3d 713, 714 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Affirmed; Appellant Cautioned.

Per Curiam.

Wallis, Lambert, and Kilbane, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network