Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Oscar Geovanni ESTRADA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Affirmed. See Bartels v. State, 410 So. 3d 21, 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (“We need not address the ‘wrong version of the statute’ argument because the victim's testimony and other evidence was sufficient to convict Appellant under the ‘sexual battery’ definitions in both the 2014 and 2022 versions of section 794.011, Florida Statutes. Thus, no fundamental error occurred because the convictions could have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.”).
Per Curiam.
May, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D2024-1170
Decided: August 13, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)