Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Richard M. SAMUEL, Appellant, v. HAMPTONS WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
In an earlier appeal involving the same action in the lower tribunal, this court affirmed a trial court's order awarding attorney's fees to Hamptons West Condominium Association, Inc. See Samuel v. Hamptons W. Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 352 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). In addition to affirming the award of trial court attorney's fees, we granted Hamptons West's motion for appellate attorney's fees as the prevailing party on appeal, and remanded the matter to the trial court to fix the amount of appellate attorney's fees to be awarded.
The trial court held a thirty-minute hearing by Zoom, and thereafter rendered a final order awarding $10,595 in appellate attorney's fees (and $1,000 in costs) to Hamptons West.
This appeal followed, and upon our review we affirm, finding without merit any of the contentions raised by Samuel, including his claim that the trial court abused its discretion, and failed to afford Samuel due process, in denying Samuel's request for a continuance of the hearing. Instead, the record reveals that the trial court had previously rescheduled the hearing on at least two occasions to accommodate the schedule of Samuel, who was proceeding pro se. Samuel was on notice of this thirty-minute remote hearing for at least two months, and the trial court acted well within its broad discretion in denying this additional request (made three days before the hearing) for another continuance of the hearing. See Tropical Jewelers, Inc. v. NationsBank, N.A. (South), 781 So. 2d 381, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“A motion for continuance ․ is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court and absent an abuse of that discretion, the court's decision will not be reversed on appeal.”).1
Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. We affirm on the remaining claims raised by Samuel, which do not warrant additional discussion.
EMAS, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D23-1246
Decided: July 30, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)