THE LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN AMBLER AMBLER LAW GROUP v. BAYFRONT SAME DAY SURGERY CENTER LLC BAYFRONT ANESTHESIA SERVICES BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER INC MICHAEL ANTONELLI JEFFREY MARDER ROBERT LYNN SWYMER CRNA TRINA LEANNE ANTONELLI CRNA SANG HEE LEE CRNA MARIA PRUSHINSKI RACHAEL TEJEDOR LINNEA STEWART MICHAEL SOLTIS DONALD BLACK ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS NICOLE DAVIS ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS NICOLE DAVIS ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS (2025)

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The appellant's motion for clarification is granted. The opinion issued on April 2, 2025, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor. The appellant's motion for rehearing is denied, and no further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.

MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL CLERK

We affirm the order granting the motion for summary judgment on Ambler Law Group's charging lien claim based on the written contract with appellees Ernest Dwayne Davis and Nicole A. Davis.¹ However, Ambler Law Group's amended notice of charging lien asserted a claim based on the theory of quantum meruit, and the Davises conceded at oral argument that the order on appeal does not address Ambler Law Group's claim for fees based on the theory of quantum meruit, that Ambler Law Group has a pending claim against the Davises for quantum meruit, and that the funds held in trust should not be released until that claim for quantum meruit is resolved. See, e.g., King v. Young, Berkman, Berman & Karpf, P.A., 709 So. 2d 572, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (holding that when a fee agreement between an attorney and client is unenforceable, “the attorney is entitled to recover on the basis of quantum meruit”). Accordingly, we remand with instructions for the trial court to strike the portion of the order that directs the immediate disbursement of the funds being held in trust.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

FOOTNOTES

1.   We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii).