Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HAROLD ANTHONY REEVES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Harold Anthony Reeves appeals from his judgment and sentences for one count of armed burglary of a conveyance, fifteen counts of burglary of an unoccupied conveyance, one count of petit theft, and one count of grand theft firearm. The trial court orally sentenced Mr. Reeves to four years’ imprisonment for the grand theft firearm charge. However, the written judgment and sentence states that Mr. Reeves was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment followed by one year of probation for this charge. Mr. Reeves filed a motion to correct sentencing error, asking the trial court to correct various points of the written sentence, including the addition of probation to the grand theft firearm sentence. Although the trial court ultimately corrected other aspects of the written sentence, it failed to address this issue during the motion hearing.
Because the written sentence for Mr. Reeves must conform to the oral pronouncement, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court for correction of the written sentence to remove the reference to probation and reflect four years’ imprisonment for the grand theft firearm count. See Cabrera-Toledo v. State, 319 So. 3d 806, 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (“A trial court's written sentence must conform to its oral pronouncement; when the two differ, that constitutes reversible error.” (quoting Gay v. State, 193 So. 3d 1069, 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016))); Parker v. State, 276 So. 3d 108, 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“Where there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence, we should remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement.” (quoting Frost v. State, 769 So. 2d 443, 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000))). In all other respects the judgment and sentences are affirmed. Since this correction will be a ministerial act, Mr. Reeves need not be present. See Devlin v. State, 224 So. 3d 803, 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
PER CURIAM.
LUCAS, C.J., and VILLANTI and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D2023-2557
Decided: July 09, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)