WARREN v. STATE (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dewayne WARREN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D22-2022

Decided: July 02, 2025

Before LOGUE, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the Appellant's use of a peremptory strike to remove a juror where the trial court found Appellant's race-neutral explanation was not credibly genuine after Appellant agreed to the sitting of another juror who expressed essentially the same concerns that formed the basis of the race-neutral explanation. We decline to hold that the trial court abused its discretion in this regard. See Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759, 764–65 (Fla. 1996) (“The court's focus ․ is not on the reasonableness of the explanation but rather its genuineness․ Accordingly, ․ the trial court's decision turns primarily on an assessment of credibility and will be affirmed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.” (footnotes omitted)).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network