ECCLESTONE v. MENDELSOHN II III II (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

E. Llwyd ECCLESTONE, Jr., Appellant, v. Wendy Walker MENDELSOHN, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust and the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust II, and Edwin Llwyd Ecclestone, III, John Strickland Ecclestone, Elizabeth Ecclestone Erdmann, Marshall Criser, and John Temple, as Trustees of the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust and the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust II, Appellees.

No. 4D2023-0835

Decided: June 18, 2025

Jackie Perczek, Roy Black, Lance W. Shinder, Maria D. Neyra and Kyle A. Johnson of Black Srebnick, Boca Raton, and Robert J. Hauser of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Roderick Coleman of Coleman Law, LLC, Boca Raton, for appellee Wendy Walker Mendelsohn, individually and as a beneficiary of the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust and the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust II. Phillip M. Burlington, Bard D. Rockenbach, and Adam J. Richardson of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees Edwin Llwyd Ecclestone, III, John Strickland Ecclestone, Elizabeth Ecclestone Erdmann, Marshall Criser, and John Temple, as trustees of the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust and the Ecclestone, Jr. Dynasty Trust II.

Dismissed. See Mendelsohn v. Ecclestone, 408 So. 3d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Per Curiam.

Klingensmith, C.J., Warner and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network