FLAHERTY v. FLAHERTY (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

James FLAHERTY, Appellant, v. Patrick FLAHERTY, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D24-0517

Decided: March 26, 2025

Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

James Flaherty, in proper person. Law Offices of Aaron Resnick, P.A., and Michael S. Greenberg, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Fision Corp. v. Frueh, 369 So. 3d 1211, 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023) (noting that “[o]nly disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment” (quotation omitted)); Rich v. Narog, 366 So. 3d 1111, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“Specifically, it is incumbent upon the nonmoving party to come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating that a genuine issue of fact exists as to an element necessary for the non-movant to prevail at trial.”); see also Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 389 So. 3d 705, 713 n.4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (noting appellate court has “no authority to search the record or briefs for new facts and reformulate a party's argument on their behalf”); Boksa v. Hogan, 389 So. 3d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (dismissing appeal in part for failure to comply with rule 9. 210(b)).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network