Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FREEDOM OFFICES CORP., and Maria Behar, Appellants, v. ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellees.
This case arises from a Coblentz agreement—a negotiated consent judgment between the injured party and the defendant where the defendant's insurance company denied coverage and declined to defend the lawsuit. Coblentz v. Am. Sur. Co. of New York, 416 F.2d 1059, 1062 (5th Cir. 1969); Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Royal Crane, LLC, 169 So. 3d 174, 180 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). To recover under the agreement, “the injured party must bring an action against the insurer and prove coverage, wrongful refusal to defend, and that the settlement was reasonable and made in good faith.” Quintana v. Barad, 528 So. 2d 1300, 1301 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Yet the Appellants Freedom Offices Corp. and Maria Behar failed to carry this burden. The trial court correctly found that Rockhill Insurance Company had no duty to defend as the terms of the policy do not provide coverage for this occurrence. The allegations of the operative complaint plainly fall within two exclusions. See generally Fojon v. Ascendant Com. Ins. Co., 393 So. 3d 806, 810–11 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“The policy must be enforced as written. Courts are without power to rewrite insurance contracts or create insurance coverage where none exists.”).
Because Rockhill Insurance Company had no duty to defend, its decision not to provide a defense was not wrongful. It likewise had no duty to indemnify. See WellCare of Fla., Inc. v. Am. Int'l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 16 So. 3d 904, 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“[T]he duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend and thus cannot exist if there is no duty to defend.”); Fed. Ins. Co. v. Applestein, 377 So. 2d 229, 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (“It has thus been uniformly held that a determination that there is no duty to defend against a particular claim carries with it the inevitable conclusion that there is none to pay an eventual judgment which may be entered upon that claim.”). Appropriately, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Rockhill Insurance Company.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D24-1339
Decided: March 26, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)