HURTA v. STATE (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Kyle Nathan HURTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D2024-1405

Decided: February 28, 2025

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

In this Anders ^* appeal, we affirm the revocation of Appellant Kyle Hurta's probation and the judgment and sentence imposed after he violated condition 5 of his supervision by being arrested on fifteen counts of possession of child pornography. However, we remand for entry of (i) an amended order of revocation of probation that identifies condition 5 as that which Hurta violated, see Bride v. State, 391 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024), and (ii) an amended order/final judgment for charges, costs, and fees judgment identifying the costs assessed only for violation of probation.

Affirmed; Remanded with instructions.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Wallis, Soud, and Pratt, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network