SCHMIDT v. STOKES MCMILLAN ANTÚNEZ MARTINEZ LEJARZA (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Janet L. SCHMIDT, et al., Appellants, v. STOKES MCMILLAN ANTÚNEZ MARTINEZ-LEJARZA, P.A., Appellee.

No. 3D23-1996

Decided: February 19, 2025

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

Janet L. Schmidt (Dagsboro, DE), for appellants. Stokes McMillan Antúnez Martinez-Lejarza, P.A., and Kimberly A. Martinez-Lejarza, Miami, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Linden v. Auto Trend, Inc., 923 So. 2d 1281, 1281–82 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“We affirm, finding that at the hearing on the motion to compel arbitration, appellant failed to demonstrate that an evidentiary hearing was required to resolve the motion.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network