THOMAS v. STATE (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Mario THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-295

Decided: February 19, 2025

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Yolande M. Samerson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Lelieve v. State, 7 So. 3d 624, 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (defendant not entitled to reversal where request for new private counsel was denied on heels of denial of request for continuance made only for purpose of delaying trial); Wade v. State, 30 So. 3d 640, 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (concluding no “palpable abuse of judicial discretion” shown where defense had three prior continuances and court was not alerted that defendant wished to substitute his counsel until morning of trial); see also Hurtado v. State, 760 So. 2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (trial court did not abuse discretion in denying request for new counsel on grounds that “[defendant's] request was made in bad faith and for the sake of arbitrary delay”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network