Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jennifer RIPPLE, as personal representative of the Estate of Richard D. Counter, deceased, Appellant, v. CBS CORPORATION, General Electric Company, the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, John Crane Inc., and Warren Pumps, LLC, Appellees.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
In Ripple v. CBS Corp., 337 So. 3d 45 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (“Ripple I”), we affirmed the trial court's granting the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on Jennifer Ripple's claim for damages under section 768.21(2) of the Florida Wrongful Death Act. Id. at 59. That provision allows a “surviving spouse” to recover “for loss of the decedent's companionship and protection and for mental pain and suffering from the date of injury.” We held that a spouse who married the decedent after the onset of the injury that caused the decedent's death cannot recover damages as a “surviving spouse” under section 768.21(2). Id.
In Ripple v. CBS Corp., 385 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. 2024) (“Ripple II”), the Supreme Court of Florida held that a spouse who married the decedent after the injury can recover damages as a “surviving spouse” under section 768.21(2). Thus, the Supreme Court quashed Ripple I to the extent Ripple I determined otherwise, and held Jennifer Ripple can recover as a “surviving spouse” under section 768.21(2). Id. at 1024, 1030. The Supreme Court remanded for proceedings consistent with its opinion. Id. at 1030.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's remand and mandate in Ripple II, we hold Jennifer Ripple can recover as a “surviving spouse” under section 768.21(2) of the Florida Wrongful Death Act. We therefore reverse the trial court's order granting the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings as to such claim. This reversal moots Ripple's alternative argument regarding the claim of the decedent's adult children for damages under section 768.21(3) of the Wrongful Death Act. We remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Per Curiam.
Ciklin, Gerber and Forst, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D2020-1939
Decided: February 19, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)