Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Alton FORBES, Appellant, v. PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
In a series of thoughtful, detailed orders on motions for summary judgment, the circuit court ruled against appellant, the plaintiff below, because appellant had failed to complete the proof of loss form required by the insurance policy for the property damage claim. We affirm the resulting final judgment against appellant. We reject appellant's argument that the insurer's improper attempt to utilize a preferred contractor to make repairs relieved appellant of the duty to submit a proof of loss, as the latter was an independent obligation under the insurance contract. The undisputed evidence showed that the insurer requested a formal proof of loss after the insurer had abandoned its reliance on an invalid preferred contractor endorsement, and that appellant failed to comply with this request.
As to the argument that the failure to file a proof of loss did not prejudice the insurer, we are bound by Goldman v. State Farm Fire General Insurance Co., 660 So. 2d 300, 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), which holds that an “insurer need not show prejudice when the insured breaches a condition precedent to suit.” We certify conflict with the following cases: Am. Integrity Ins. Co. v. Estrada, 276 So. 3d 905, 916 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (holding that “the insurer must be prejudiced by the insured's noncompliance with a post-loss obligation in order for the insured to forfeit coverage,” and that when “an insured has failed to substantially comply with a contractually mandated post-loss obligation, prejudice to the insurer from the insured's material breach is presumed, and the burden then shifts to the insured to show that any breach of post-loss obligations did not prejudice the insurer”); Shivdasani v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 306 So. 3d 1156, 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (applying Estrada); Allstate Floridian Ins. Co. v. Farmer, 104 So. 3d 1242, 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (holding that the trial court did not err in allowing the insureds to prove to the jury that the insurer was not prejudiced by their failure to submit a proof of loss).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Per Curiam.
Warner, Gross and May, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D2023-2375
Decided: January 08, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)