LEON v. BUSTAMANTE (2025)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Marta De LEON, Appellant, v. Fiordaliza BUSTAMANTE, Appellee.

No. 3D23-1911

Decided: January 02, 2025

Before LINDSEY, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.

Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellant. Legon, Fodiman & Sudduth, P.A., and William F. Rhodes, for appellee.

Affirmed. See United Brands, S.A. v. Diageo Dominicana, S.R.L., 209 So. 3d 67, 68–9 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (affirming the issuance of an anti-suit injunction against the defendant who initiated litigation against the plaintiff in the Dominican Republic despite an agreement executed by the parties which stated that litigation may only be brought in Miami-Dade County, Florida); see also Rich v. Narog, 366 So. 3d 1111, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“Specifically, it is incumbent upon the nonmoving party to come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating that a genuine issue of fact exists as to an element necessary for the non-movant to prevail at trial.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network