KRAPFF GRAY AND NIGHTENGALE PROPERTIES LLC v. WILMINGTON TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF MFRA TRUST 2014 (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

KRAPFF, GRAY, AND NIGHTENGALE PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant, v. WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Not in its Individual Capacity, but Solely AS TRUSTEE OF MFRA TRUST 2014-2, Appellee.

No. 3D23-2203

Decided: December 18, 2024

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.

Florin, Gray, Bouzas and Owens, LLC, and Christopher D. Gray (Lutz), for appellant. Atlas | Solomon, PLLC, Eric M. Levine, and Eric S. Matthew (Stuart), for appellee.

Because the trial court's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm. See Marrone v. Miami Nat'l Bank, 507 So. 2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“In a non-jury case, it is the trial court's duty to reconcile conflicts in the testimony, to judge the credibility of witnesses, and to determine the weight of the evidence presented. This court will not disturb the trial court's findings, which are presumed correct, unless they are totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence.”) (internal citations omitted); § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2023).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network