Antonio Giles, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Antonio Giles, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D2024-0434

Decided: December 06, 2024

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.

In this Anders ^* appeal, upon independent review of the record, we affirm. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987). However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order reflecting its oral revocation of probation and the conditions of probation that the trial court found Appellant to have violated. See Mitchell v. State, 238 So. 3d 386, 386–87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Barta v. State, 678 So. 2d 923, 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Affirmed; Remanded with directions.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Soud, MacIver, and Pratt, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network