Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Midland Credit Management, Inc., Appellant, v. Terry Maitland, Appellee.
Midland Credit Management, Inc., appeals the trial court's order of dismissal with prejudice upon expiration of the extension of time to effect service upon the defendant below. Based on the record on appeal, to the extent the trial court entered the dismissal with prejudice as a sanction for noncompliance with a court order, such dismissal with prejudice without a notice and opportunity to be heard and entry of findings pursuant to the Kozel factors constituted an abuse of discretion. See Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817, 818 (Fla. 1993) (noting that dismissing a case solely based on an attorney's neglect unduly punishes the litigant and holding that “[b]ecause dismissal is the ultimate sanction in the adversarial system, it should be reserved for those aggravating circumstances in which a lesser sanction would fail to achieve a just result”); Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Bennett, 291 So. 3d 605, 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (“This court and others have found such an abuse where a trial judge dismisses an action with prejudice without making express written findings of fact supporting the conclusion that the failure to obey the court order demonstrated willful or deliberate disregard.” (quotations omitted)); Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So. 2d 561, 573 (Fla. 2005) (“A lower court's decision to impose sanctions is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”). To the extent the dismissal was based on the failure to serve within 120 days after filing of the initial pleading directed to the defendant, it was an abuse of discretion to dismiss the action with prejudice. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070(j) (explaining that after notice or on motion if a party fails to show good cause or excusable neglect for failure to effect service within the requisite time the court “must dismiss the action without prejudice” (emphasis added)). We therefore vacate the dismissal with prejudice and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 3D23-2089
Decided: November 06, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)