ALMEYDA v. ALMEYDA (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Alessandra ALMEYDA, Appellant, v. Jimmy ALMEYDA, Appellee.

No. 3D23-0857

Decided: October 16, 2024

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

Mandel Law Group, P.A., and Roberta G. Mandel, for appellant. Abramowitz and Associates, and Evan L. Abramowitz, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Rowland v. Rowland, 868 So. 2d 608, 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (“We conclude that the Wife's testimony and the production of the Wife's Florida driver's license provided competent, substantial evidence supporting the trial court's findings as to the Wife's residency and the court's jurisdiction, and we affirm.”); Jenkins v. Jenkins, 915 So. 2d 1248, 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“We agree with the trial court's conclusion that the husband was a resident of Florida. Even though the husband's physical presence in Florida over the year preceding the filing of the petition was de minimis, the trial court correctly determined the ‘chief seat of the husband's affairs and interests’ remains in Florida, creating presence and the requisite objective intent to be a Florida resident.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network