MANIMAL LAND COMPANY INC v. HEALTHCARE APPRAISERS INC (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

MANIMAL LAND COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. HEALTHCARE APPRAISERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2001

Decided: September 25, 2024

Howard D. DuBosar and Harrison R. DuBosar of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Boca Raton, and Edward G. Guedes of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Coral Gables, for appellant. Michael W. Simon of Simon & Sigalos, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Barakat v. Broward Cnty. Hous. Auth., 771 So. 2d 1193, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“It is never the role of a trial court to rewrite a contract to make it more reasonable for one of the parties or to relieve a party from what turns out to be a bad bargain.”); Burns v. Barfield, 732 So. 2d 1202, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“In the absence of ambiguity, the language itself is the best evidence of the parties’ intent and its plain meaning controls.”).

Per Curiam.

Warner, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network