GONZALEZ v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Carlos M. GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D23-742

Decided: September 04, 2024

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

Property Litigation Group PLLC and Melissa Duran (Miramar), for appellant. Link & Rockenbach, PA., and Kara Rockenbach Link and David A. Noel (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Estate of Herrera v. Berlo Indus., Inc., 840 So. 2d 272, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“[I]ssues not presented in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Aris v. Applebaum, 184 So. 3d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (holding party who believes error has not been cured by court's actions must contemporaneously move for mistrial in order to preserve issue for later consideration of motion for new trial); Rohrback v. Dauer, 528 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (finding no abuse of discretion when trial court is unconvinced that counsel's remarks were so egregious as to interfere with essential justice of result).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network